Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues — by Emanuel A. Schegloff (auth.), Eduard H. Hovy, Donia R. Scott

By Emanuel A. Schegloff (auth.), Eduard H. Hovy, Donia R. Scott (eds.)

People have interaction in discourse each day - from writing letters and featuring papers to uncomplicated discussions. but discourse is a posh and engaging phenomenon that's not good understood. This quantity stems from a multidisciplinary workshop within which eminent students in linguistics, sociology and computational linguistics awarded a variety of features of discourse. the subjects taken care of diversity from multi-party conversational interactions to deconstructing textual content from quite a few views, contemplating topic-focus improvement and discourse constitution, and an empirical examine of discourse segmentation. The chapters not just describe each one author's favourite burning factor in discourse but additionally offer a desirable view of the learn technique and elegance of argumentation in each one field.

Show description

Read Online or Download Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues — An Interdisciplinary Account PDF

Similar nonfiction_8 books

Superlattices and Other Heterostructures: Symmetry and Optical Phenomena

Superlattices and different Heterostructures bargains with the optical homes of superlattices and quantum good constructions with emphasis on phenomena ruled by means of crystal symmetries. After a short creation to workforce concept and symmetries, tools for calculating spectra of electrons, excitons, and phonons in heterostructures are mentioned.

Masses of Fundamental Particles: Cargèse 1996

Boson plenty within the commonplace version; D. Treille. Non-Commutative Geometry and the interior house of Gauge Theories; T. Krajewski. most sensible Quark Mass; J. L. Rosner. Unified Theories of Flavour with U(2) as Horizontal crew; A. Romanino. Heavy-Quark lots; M. Neubert. Light-Quark plenty; H. Leutwyler. vulnerable Matrix components at the Lattice: fresh advancements in K-Physics; M.

Extra resources for Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues — An Interdisciplinary Account

Example text

Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press. 155-172. Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse. N ew Y ork: Academic Press. Lerner, G. H. (1987). Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Constructionand Social Action. D. dissertation, School of Social Science, University of California, lrvine. Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress. Language in Society 20: 441-458. Lerner, G. H. (forthcoming). On the 'Semi-Penneable' Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.

Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of 'uh huh' and Other Things that Come Between Sentences. In D. ), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. , Georgetown University Press. 71-93. Schegloff, E. A (1984). On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. M. e. ), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28-52. Schegloff, E. A (1986). The Routine as Achievement. Human Studies 9: 111-151. Schegloff, E. A (1987). Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis.

If the issue regarding objectively testable is quantification, cf. the discussion in Schegloff, 1993. A. Schegloff one sees and their significance. So it is crucial to know whether he thinks that this is in principle possible, even if it is not a currently achievable goal. If he doesn 't, then there seems little hope of any integration between those adopting more computational approaches and researchers such as Schegloff. 4a) I do hope that students of discourse will come to appreciate that criticizing "formal modelling approaches" for not incorporating "features such as interaction and timing into their analyses" is not a stylistic or paradigmatic or political option which one may or may not adopt.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.68 of 5 – based on 48 votes